Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bernie Paquette's avatar

Can we learn from this to fundamentally adapt speed control?

Under the current system of relying mostly on traffic fines, the state receives the fine, and only a small percentage is returned to the city or town. Thus, the cost-effectiveness is reduced for the town. Secondly, only a small percentage of speeders are 'caught' and fined. Speed studies show speed and the number of speeders rising substantially over the last ten years. Driver behavior is, for the most part not being affected. Patrol cars influence behavior temporarily and primarily where visible. Road design, however, influences behavior continuously.

Research from the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, state transportation agencies, and federal highway safety programs consistently shows that traffic-calming infrastructure is more effective at reducing speeds than enforcement alone.

Narrowed travel lanes, gateway treatments, lane shifts, raised crossings, chicanes, and other traffic-calming measures naturally encourage slower driving, whether or not law enforcement is present.

Enforcement can support safer roads, but it cannot engineer them. Road design can.

Chuck Lacy's avatar

Let the truckers go through. Just charge them a $20,000 toll up front. The word will get around.

No posts

Ready for more?